Trump threats cause dilemma for US officers: disobey orders or commit war crimes — On: Trump threats cause dilemma for US officers: disobey orders or commit war crimes
The news arrives like a clinical note slipped under my door. The dilemma presented is a false one, a Manichean trap dressed in legal language. “Disobey orders or commit war crimes.” The very phrasing reveals the zone. For the officer who receives the order, the world is split: the zone of being, where he is a loyal soldier following lawful command, and the zone of non-being, where he becomes a war criminal. The system demands he choose which mask to wear, while ensuring both choices serve its logic of domination.
But the real violence is already complete. It is not in the potential explosion, but in the construction of the dilemma itself. The order, when it comes, will be epidermalized. It will be written on the body of the target nation - “infrastructure” - and internalized by the officer as “military necessity.” The legal experts debate the boundary of the crime, but they are surveying the fence around the zone of non-being. Their metrics of proportionality and distinction are the coloniser’s categories, designed to make the unthinkable calculable.
The officer’s anguish is authentic, but it is the anguish of a man staring into a mirror that reflects only the state’s gaze. He asks, “Will I be held responsible?” This is the question of someone who still believes he resides in the zone of being, where responsibility is personal and justice is blind. He does not yet see that the structure absolves in advance; it will either pardon the “crime” as lawful or sacrifice the “criminal” to preserve the system’s appearance of legality.
True disobedience is not choosing between the two masks offered. It is the violent, psychic refusal of the mirror itself. It is the shattering of the dilemma by naming its source: a political will that requires the constant production of the non-being - of nations, of peoples, of legal and moral categories - to sustain its own being. Until that recognition happens, the officer will tremble at the crossroads, and the experts will refine their definitions, while the machinery grinds on, awaiting only the signal to translate the statistical target into another archive of ash.